Customer stories
Blog articles
Turn tech stack frustrations into a roadmap for AI underwriting
Every underwriting leader knows the feeling: you’ve invested time and budget into systems that were supposed to streamline workflows, improve visibility, and support better decisions. But in practice, your teams are still chasing down guidelines, toggling between platforms, and spending too much time on business you’ll never write.
That frustration is more than just operational noise; it’s signaling where your organization is ready for change.
If quoting is slow, start with what your underwriters are seeing
Delays in quoting are often attributed to workflow inefficiencies, but they often stem from a lack of prioritization. Many underwriters are still quoting everything that comes through the door, often on a first-in-first-out basis, regardless of whether it’s aligned with appetite or likely to bind. That slows response times, reduces hit ratios, impacts performance, and can damage broker relationships.
AI-supported submission triage is one way to solve this. By scoring submissions based on appetite and winnability early at the point of submission, teams can focus on the deals that matter most. This not only reduces time to quote but also increases the percentage of high-value deals that actually close.
If your team is stuck in too many tools, look for the missing context
The problem isn’t just the number of systems. It’s the lack of connection between them. When data lives in separate tools and guidance is hidden in static documents, underwriters spend more time gathering information than applying it.
A unified interface can help, but the real value comes when strategy is embedded into the workflow. When underwriters can clearly see how each decision ties back to appetite, goals, and portfolio impact, the work gets faster and smarter. Context turns guidance into action.
If you’re getting surprised by portfolio performance, improve the feedback loop
Quarterly and monthly reports are valuable for leadership visibility, but they don’t help underwriters course-correct in real time. Without timely feedback, even small misalignments between strategy and execution can lead to accumulation issues, missed growth targets, or compliance gaps.
Embedding portfolio guidance into day-to-day decisions changes this. Underwriters can see how a given deal impacts broader goals and adjust accordingly. Leaders get fewer surprises, and the organization becomes more responsive to change.
If change feels expensive or slow, rethink how agility is defined
Many insurers have spent heavily on technology only to find themselves locked into tools that are hard to update or expand. New products take months to launch. Rules are difficult to adjust. The flexibility underwriting teams need isn’t built into the system.
The alternative is configurability. When platforms allow for real-time updates to rules, goals, and workflows without deep IT involvement, the business can adapt quickly. This kind of agility doesn’t mean building from scratch. It means using platforms that are built to flex with your strategy, not constrain it.
Use the friction to find your edge
Each recurring frustration in your underwriting workbench and tech stack is a signal. It shows where strategy isn’t reaching the front lines, where process is disconnected from insight, and where underwriters are being asked to do too much with too little support.
Better technology won’t fix everything. But the right tools and operational frameworks can unlock better thinking, better decisions, and better outcomes. When underwriters have systems that reflect how they work and what the business is trying to achieve, the results follow.
Explore how the Federato platform can help transform tech stack frustration into profitable growth. Book a demo or take a self-guided tour of the platform today.
