Claims History & Loss Data
Workplace Safety
Business & Industry Coding Systems
Geospatial & Environmental Risk
The 2025 Federato State of Underwriting Report is Here. Get it Now >
Explore the Federato platform at your own pace with our free interactive product tour.
Take a tourCommercial drone operations are growing quickly. From infrastructure inspection to long-distance delivery, drones are being used in more ways than ever before.
As drone technology advances, regulations are changing to keep up. These changes affect how drones are flown and how insurers evaluate the risks involved.
One of the most important changes in recent years is the introduction of new rules for Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) operations. These rules are helping define the future of drone insurance.
Drone regulations have changed significantly as more drones are used for commercial purposes. What started as a mostly recreational activity is now a professional tool used across industries. This shift has led regulators to update laws that better reflect the risks of commercial drone use.
BVLOS stands for Beyond Visual Line of Sight. It refers to drone flights that go beyond what the operator can physically see without assistance. BVLOS allows drones to cover much larger areas, which is important for tasks like surveying, delivery, and infrastructure monitoring.
Because BVLOS flights involve higher risk—such as losing visual contact or entering restricted airspace—regulatory agencies like the FAA in the U.S. and EASA in Europe have created new guidelines. These include stricter pilot certifications, remote identification requirements, and operational risk assessments.
The introduction of BVLOS-specific regulations has also changed how insurers evaluate drone operations. New exposures include greater chances of third-party damage, airspace violations, and system failures. As a result, insurers are adapting policies to address these risks and often require operators to demonstrate clear compliance with updated rules.
Commercial drone insurance policies now include several types of coverage designed to address risks tied to advanced operations, especially Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) flights.
Liability insurance covers damage or injury caused to people or property by a drone during operation. For commercial use, this often includes coverage for accidents involving bystanders, vehicles, buildings, or other aircraft.
Coverage limits for standard operations typically range from $500,000 to several million dollars, depending on drone use and flight environment. BVLOS operations often require higher limits due to their extended range and reduced operator visibility.
Common liability claims include:
Hull insurance covers physical damage to the drone itself. This includes repairs or replacement following incidents such as crashes, equipment failure, or environmental impacts.
BVLOS-capable drones often include advanced navigation systems, sensors, and communication hardware, which increase replacement costs. Hull coverage becomes particularly important when drones operate in high-risk environments like remote terrain or urban areas where recovery after a crash may be difficult.
Cyber insurance addresses risks related to unauthorized access, data breaches, and system interference. Drones that transmit or collect data during flight are exposed to hacking or interception of sensitive information.
Current guidelines now include expectations for cyber coverage when drones are used for mapping, surveillance, or data collection. This includes protection against data loss, manipulation, or unauthorized access to systems controlling flight paths.
Privacy insurance applies to drones that use cameras or sensors that could capture images or data from individuals or private property. This coverage addresses claims related to unintentional surveillance or violations of privacy laws.
Many jurisdictions have updated privacy regulations that apply specifically to commercial drone operations. These include mandatory disclosures and limitations on data storage. Privacy insurance covers legal expenses resulting from complaints or investigations related to the use of onboard imaging technology.
As drone technology becomes more advanced, insurance policies are adjusting to cover new types of risk that did not exist in earlier drone operations.
Autonomous flight risks: Drones that operate without human intervention face unique challenges. These include incorrect route planning, failure to respond to unexpected obstacles, and system errors during critical flight phases.
Software and firmware failures: Drone performance depends on stable software. Errors from corrupted updates or security vulnerabilities can cause system failure mid-flight. Updated insurance guidelines now consider software maintenance as part of risk assessment.
Air traffic conflicts: Drones operating in controlled airspace may encounter manned aircraft or other drones. These conflicts can lead to mid-air collisions. Insurance policies now address airspace deconfliction procedures and the use of Unmanned Traffic Management (UTM) systems.
Environmental factors: Weather events like strong winds or sudden temperature changes can interfere with drone sensors and flight stability. Electromagnetic interference from power lines or communication towers can disrupt GPS or control systems.
Regulatory compliance risks: Drones that operate outside of regulatory guidelines may be excluded from insurance coverage. This includes missing Remote ID requirements or operating without proper waivers for BVLOS. Some policies include clauses that void coverage in cases of non-compliance.
Data analytics and artificial intelligence are changing how insurers assess and price risk in commercial drone insurance. Traditional methods relied on general assumptions about operator behavior. Today, underwriting decisions are increasingly based on actual records from flights, equipment, and operator history.
Telematics technology collects and transmits flight data from drones, including duration, altitude, distance, speed, and location. Insurers use this information to understand how drones are operated in different environments. Consistent, safe flying patterns can result in more favorable insurance terms.
AI-driven risk assessment differs from traditional underwriting by analyzing large volumes of data at once. AI systems can evaluate patterns in flight behavior, identify anomalies, and compare operator performance to industry benchmarks. This allows for faster, more accurate risk evaluations, especially for complex BVLOS operations.
Data-driven underwriting also allows insurers to respond to changes in real time. For example, if a drone's software is updated or if the operator completes an advanced training course, the system can adjust the risk profile without manual intervention.
Modern underwriting platforms support this process by consolidating flight data, operator profiles, and regulatory information into a single interface. These platforms enable insurers to evaluate unmanned aerial systems (UAS) risks more effectively and align underwriting decisions with both portfolio strategy and regulatory compliance.
Insurance capacity refers to the total amount of risk an insurer is willing to cover. For advanced drone operations, especially BVLOS flights, this capacity remains limited because of the greater risk involved.
To secure coverage, drone operators often work with brokers who specialize in aviation risk or present proof of advanced training, regulatory compliance, and strong safety records. Some insurers may only offer BVLOS coverage to operators with specific certifications or approved risk mitigation measures.
Drone operations that cross national borders are subject to different aviation laws and insurance requirements in each country. There is no single global standard for commercial UAV insurance.
Regional differences include:
Operators flying internationally need to understand how differences in privacy laws, airspace control, and liability frameworks impact what coverage is accepted in each jurisdiction.
To address capacity challenges and evolving risks, insurers are working with technology companies that specialize in drone operations, telematics, and risk analytics.
Some carriers are using real-time flight data platforms to understand how drones behave during missions. Others are integrating data from Unmanned Traffic Management systems to improve underwriting accuracy. These partnerships support more precise policy development and may improve access to coverage for qualified operators.
Commercial drone operators complete training to meet regulatory requirements. These programs include FAA Part 107 certification in the United States or EASA-approved training in the European Union. BVLOS operations may require additional credentials, such as a BVLOS waiver or remote pilot license.
Insurers typically ask for proof of training when reviewing applications. Operators who hold advanced certifications for BVLOS or autonomous operations are often evaluated separately from standard operators and may qualify for more comprehensive coverage options.
Insurers often request evidence of documented safety procedures. This includes pre-flight checklists, flight risk assessments, emergency response plans, and maintenance logs.
Remote ID compliance is required in many regions. Drones must transmit identification and location data during flight. Failure to comply with Remote ID requirements may limit insurance eligibility or result in higher premiums due to increased regulatory risk.
Drone insurance policies should be reviewed when significant changes occur. A review may be triggered by acquiring a new drone, changing mission types, entering new airspace, or updating onboard systems.
Operations that expand across borders, begin BVLOS missions, or add autonomous capabilities may require new endorsements or a full policy update. Insurers may also ask for updated documentation during renewals to verify continued compliance and operational changes.
Commercial drone insurance continues to evolve, especially for operators flying Beyond Visual Line of Sight. Regulatory agencies are introducing new frameworks that require clear documentation, aircraft-specific coverage, and alignment with airspace integration systems.
Upcoming changes include increased enforcement of Remote ID standards, wider adoption of risk assessment protocols, and certification requirements tied to both the drone and the operator. These changes are prompting insurers to reassess how they measure risk and underwrite policies.
Insurance policies are becoming more customized, reflecting each drone's technical features, flight patterns, and mission objectives. This includes considering the drone's ability to operate autonomously, comply with tracking protocols, and function in high-density or restricted airspace.
Operators preparing for these changes are collecting detailed flight data, maintaining current certifications, and documenting all aspects of their operational risk management. Insurers are increasingly using this information to assess eligibility and determine coverage terms.
As the regulatory environment becomes more complex, underwriting systems that can process and respond to real-time operator data are becoming more important. Platforms using AI and data analytics help insurers by consolidating flight records, compliance status, and operator history into a single view.