Contractual liability refers to legal responsibilities a party assumes through a contract, responsibilities that would not exist absent that agreement. This differs from liabilities imposed by law, such as negligence or statutory obligations.
Most liability policies cover only obligations that exist independent of a contract. When a business agrees to indemnify another party or assume broader responsibility, that liability may fall outside the scope of standard coverage.
Policies typically include a contractual liability exclusion, which removes coverage for obligations assumed solely under contract unless specific endorsements apply.
Coverage gaps occur when contractual obligations extend beyond what a liability policy is designed to cover. These are especially common in:
Organizations unaware of these mismatches may face uncovered losses, denied claims, or litigation expenses that fall outside their policy terms.
The contractual liability exclusion applies to liabilities that exist only because of a contractual agreement. Coverage is available only if:
Understand how your policy defines and limits contractual liability. Look for:
Action: Map contract clauses against policy provisions to identify misalignments.
Overly broad indemnity provisions often exceed insurable risk. Example:
Clauses that waive subrogation rights or cap recoveries can conflict with insurance terms, potentially voiding coverage or complicating claims.
AI and data analytics can identify emerging exposures by scanning contracts and comparing them to policy language.
Platforms like Federato’s RiskOps streamline this process by:
Key data points to monitor:
Strategic risk transfer ensures liabilities assumed in contracts are insurable and addressed by current coverage.
Certificates of insurance (COIs) may not reveal exclusions or missing endorsements. Always:
Red flag: A COI listing general liability without a contractual liability endorsement may create a false sense of protection.
Effective clauses should:
Common endorsements that support contract risk include:
Sample endorsement language: “This policy extends coverage to liabilities assumed under written contracts executed prior to the occurrence.”
New products, services, or business models can introduce contractual obligations that current policies don’t contemplate.
Best practice: Align contract reviews with operational and underwriting changes to maintain adequate coverage.
Policy and contract reviews should be conducted:
Strategic liability structuring connects three key elements:
When managed cohesively, this structure ensures that assumed liabilities are not overlooked and that policies respond as intended.
General liability covers losses arising from business operations. Contractual liability covers obligations assumed through a contract, often requiring specific endorsements.
Standard exclusions remove coverage for liabilities that exist only due to a contract, unless specifically endorsed back in.
During annual policy renewals, when contracts change, or when new operations introduce risk.
Overbroad indemnity agreements, warranty guarantees, and liability waivers inconsistent with policy language.
Data analytics identifies mismatches between contractual obligations and policy coverage, improving risk visibility and structuring precision.
