Claims History & Loss Data
Workplace Safety
Business & Industry Coding Systems
Geospatial & Environmental Risk
The 2025 Federato State of Underwriting Report is Here. Get it Now >
Explore the Federato platform at your own pace with our free interactive product tour.
Take a tourHybrid business models are becoming more common across industries, including insurance. These models combine different ways of doing business—such as selling products directly and through intermediaries, or offering both subscription services and one-time purchases. As these models evolve, they introduce new types of risk that do not fit neatly into traditional underwriting frameworks.
Underwriting in this context requires new methods for analyzing and understanding risk. Standard questions and templates are often insufficient because hybrid businesses operate across multiple channels, serve different customer segments, and pursue varied goals. This creates complexity across operations, data, and decision-making.
Traditional underwriting systems were built for more linear business models. They often rely on structured data, predefined risk categories, and legacy workflows. These tools are challenged when trying to assess businesses that operate with more fluid and blended strategies.
Hybrid business models in insurance combine multiple revenue streams, operational approaches, or distribution strategies. They integrate direct-to-consumer services with broker networks, or mix traditional policy offerings with newer subscription-based products.
Digital transformation, changing customer expectations, and market competition drive the growth of these models. Insurers now deliver coverage through various channels, from mobile apps to agent networks, creating more complex business structures.
Examples of hybrid insurance selling models include:
Multiple revenue streams: Hybrid models generate income from premiums, subscription fees, partnership commissions, and value-added services.
Cross-channel operations: These businesses serve customers through digital platforms, physical locations, and third-party networks simultaneously.
Technology integration: They rely on connected systems to manage customer data, risk assessment, and service delivery across channels.
Traditional underwriting methods struggle with hybrid business models because they weren't designed for businesses operating in multiple ways simultaneously. These methods follow fixed processes with standard data inputs that don't capture the full picture of hybrid operations.
One major challenge is data fragmentation. Information lives in separate systems for each part of the business, making it hard to see how risks connect across operations. An issue in one channel might affect others, but traditional tools can't easily show these relationships.
Risk assessment frameworks also create problems. Conventional underwriting uses predefined categories that don't account for businesses mixing digital platforms with physical operations or combining different service models.
Legacy systems lack the flexibility to adapt to these complex models. They're built for step-by-step processes rather than the interconnected, dynamic nature of hybrid businesses.
This gap between traditional methods and modern business models creates an opportunity for next-generation underwriting approaches that better reflect today's reality.
Modernizing your underwriting for hybrid business models doesn't have to be overwhelming. Here's a practical roadmap to help you get started.
Hybrid businesses generate information across multiple channels and systems. To understand their risk profile, you need data from various sources.
Internal data includes policy systems, customer relationship platforms, and claims records. External sources might be industry benchmarks, credit reports, and public records.
Real-time data is especially important for hybrid models because it shows how different parts of the business are performing right now, not just historically.
Key data to collect includes:
AI and predictive analytics help make sense of complex data from hybrid models. These tools can process information faster and identify patterns humans might miss.
Look for technologies that:
When choosing tools, consider how they'll connect with your existing systems. The goal is to enhance your workflow, not complicate it.
Effective underwriting for hybrid models combines technology and human expertise. Clear workflows help everyone understand their role.
Start by mapping out which tasks are best handled by automation versus human review. For example, data gathering and initial scoring might be automated, while final decisions on complex cases remain with underwriters.
Decision points: Define clear thresholds for when cases move from automated processing to human review.
Communication flow: Establish how information moves between systems and team members.
Exception handling: Create specific steps for managing unusual cases that don't fit standard patterns.
Remember that implementing new workflows requires change management. Provide training and support to help your team adapt to new processes.
Tracking performance helps you see if your new approach is working. Start by establishing baseline measurements before making changes.
Important metrics to watch include:
Review these regularly and look for patterns. Are certain types of hybrid models performing better than others? Are there opportunities to refine your approach?
Use what you learn to make ongoing improvements to your underwriting process.
Hybrid business models create complex risk pictures that traditional analysis can't fully capture. AI helps by connecting dots across different parts of the business and spotting patterns humans might miss.
Machine learning models can identify relationships between seemingly unrelated factors. For example, how customer service metrics in one channel might predict claims in another, or how seasonal patterns affect different revenue streams differently.
Pattern recognition: AI excels at finding connections between data points across business lines, showing how risks in one area might affect others.
Predictive modeling: These tools forecast how different scenarios might impact the business, helping underwriters prepare for various outcomes.
Automated triage: AI can quickly sort submissions based on risk factors, helping teams focus on the most promising opportunities.
The most effective approach combines AI capabilities with human judgment. Technology handles data processing and pattern recognition, while underwriters apply their expertise to context and decision-making.
Hybrid business models often face more complex regulatory requirements than traditional ones. They may operate across multiple jurisdictions or combine activities that fall under different regulatory frameworks.
This complexity creates unique challenges for underwriters. A business might comply with regulations in one area but face issues in another, affecting its overall risk profile.
Start by identifying which regulations apply to each part of the hybrid model. This includes:
Create a comprehensive map showing which rules apply where. This helps underwriters understand the full regulatory landscape affecting the business.
When requirements conflict between jurisdictions, document how the business addresses these conflicts. Does it apply the stricter standard across all operations? Does it maintain separate processes for different regions?
Technology can help track changing regulations and alert teams when updates might affect underwriting decisions.
Compliance isn't a one-time check but an ongoing process. Establish routines to monitor regulatory compliance across all aspects of the hybrid model.
Effective monitoring includes:
These practices help ensure that underwriting decisions account for regulatory factors and can be defended if questioned.
The insurance industry is moving toward more sophisticated approaches to underwriting hybrid business models. This shift reflects broader changes in how businesses operate and how risk is understood.
Data integration is becoming more seamless. Instead of separate systems for different business lines, unified platforms provide a complete view of risk across operations. This helps underwriters see how different parts of a hybrid model influence each other.
AI and machine learning continue to evolve, offering more precise risk assessment. These tools help identify subtle patterns and relationships that might affect performance across business lines.
Underwriter roles are changing too. Rather than processing standard submissions, underwriters increasingly focus on complex cases, strategic decisions, and relationship management. They become risk advisors rather than just risk assessors.
New hybrid models continue to emerge as businesses experiment with different combinations of products, services, and delivery channels. This creates opportunities for insurers who can effectively evaluate and support these innovative approaches.
The most successful underwriting teams will combine technology and human expertise. They'll use digital tools to handle routine tasks and data analysis while applying human judgment to complex decisions and relationship building.
Next-generation underwriting offers a better way to evaluate hybrid business models. By combining AI-powered analytics with human expertise, insurers can make more informed decisions about these complex risks.
This approach provides several advantages:
For underwriters, this represents an opportunity to focus on higher-value work. Rather than struggling with fragmented data and manual processes, they can use integrated tools to